Publication 4H222
In the 4‑H Youth Development Program, non-competitive activities are encouraged to help build attitudes of friendliness and cooperation. If the only events that 4‑H youth participate in are competitive in nature, then we build only competitive attitudes. So, how does the judge make a difference?
Sometimes, even non-competitive events are seen as competitive by the youth, which causes stress and can put pressure on the participants, leaders, and parents. The judges should de-emphasize this impression. This can become a problem, especially when the judging criteria are unclear. Judges should provide constructive criticism to the youth participant while keeping in mind that positive remarks are extremely beneficial. Remember, the judging results will reflect an opinion; therefore, evaluations and decisions may vary among judges.
When You're the Judge
- Remember, the goals are to teach the 4‑H youth public speaking skills and provide a forum where the 4‑H youth can practice giving a presentation. Emphasis should be on the individual's presentation—that is, the planning, the ideas, and thought in organizing, delivery, summary, or lesson taught.
- It is important to judge the youth participant's speaking effort as well as the subject matter presented. In public presentations, 4‑H youth are learning to do public speaking. They are not to be experts in a particular subject matter area.
- Know the judging rubric and follow it carefully. Do not allow personal biases to influence your comments and decisions.
- Be consistent in your judgment.
- Judge each presentation on its own merit, not by reputation or by comparing presentations.
- Emphasize positive aspects before making any critiques. Make critical comments in a positive manner.
- Written or verbal critical comments should not be harsh. Ask yourself, "Would I appreciate reading this statement from my own child's score sheet, or having my own child hear what I intend to say?"
- Initial the score sheet. If you're feeling uncomfortable in doing so, it may indicate your ratings or comments are overly harsh or unfair.
- Stress the learning and accomplishments that have taken place rather than the award being given.
- When judging more than one presentation, wait until all youth have done their presentation before making any comments or announcing awards.
- Verbal comments should be limited to generalities that apply to the entire group. Comments specific to an individual should be confined to the scoresheet.
- Treat the 4‑H youth as an individual. We all have different abilities. Use this event to stimulate growth, to motivate children to learn more. We want this experience to be positive for all participants.
This publication is based on the work of Gail Bethard, Former 4‑H Program Associate, Somerset County & Keith Diem, Ph.D., Program Leader in Educational Design.
July 2025
Copyright © 2026 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. All rights reserved.
For more information: njaes.rutgers.edu.
Cooperating Agencies: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Boards of County Commissioners. Rutgers Cooperative Extension, a unit of the Rutgers New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, is an equal opportunity program provider and employer.

